Clicky

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
84
Imaging
53
Features
39
Overall
47
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR Mount A12
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1/9000s Max Shutter
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
  • Released August 2011
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Released January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) and WB350F (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The GXR Mount A12 was unveiled 3 years before the WB350F which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.

Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a short view of how the GXR Mount A12 grades vs the WB350F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Samsung WB350F

 GXR Mount A12 WB350F 
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12

 WB350F GXR Mount A12 
ReleasedJanuary 2014August 2011Newer by 29 months
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung WB350F

 GXR Mount A12 WB350F 
Focus manually More exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurements
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR Mount A12 comes with exterior dimensions of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") and a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Analyze the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the GXR Mount A12 against the WB350F.

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR Mount A12 and WB350F is 84 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through specs. The pic below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR Mount A12 and WB350F.

All in all, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GXR Mount A12 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Samsung WB350F will provide you with greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged GXR Mount A12 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography highlights
55
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
40
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Street photography details
Samsung WB350F Street photography details
65
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
no image stabilization
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (276 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sports photography information
Samsung WB350F Sports photography information
39
max shutter speed is good (1/9,000s)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
can't change focal length (()mm)
doesn't have liveview
low frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
resolution not great (12MP)
lacks phase detect autofocus
50
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh GXR Mount A12
Travel photography with Samsung WB350F
60
has built in flash
fast max aperture (f)
missing Timelapse mode
resolution not great (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
69
lighter than competitors (276g)
good MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (23mm)
very long zoom (483mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR Mount A12
Landscape photography with Samsung WB350F
52
has manual focus
fast max aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inches)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
missing Timelapse mode
50
has manual focus
decently wide (23mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Vlogging info
Samsung WB350F Vlogging info
26
fast max aperture (f)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone socket
34
decently wide (23mm)
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (276g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung WB350F
 Ricoh GXR Mount A12Samsung WB350F
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Samsung WB350F
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2011-08-05 2014-01-07
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 370.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 2848 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range () 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8-5.9
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1 seconds 16 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/9000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 9.60 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 370 gr (0.82 lb) 276 gr (0.61 lb)
Dimensions 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 photos -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model DB-90 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (5 sec, custom) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Retail cost $349 $260