Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27f00/27f002f9b360b27dd43a21dfef0ba4e91344bfbc" alt="Ricoh GXR Mount A12 front Ricoh GXR Mount A12 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70455/70455b470de7a381df26b21e53c60bdd7569f00d" alt="Samsung WB350F front Samsung WB350F front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Released January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) and WB350F (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The GXR Mount A12 was unveiled 3 years before the WB350F which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a short view of how the GXR Mount A12 grades vs the WB350F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung WB350F. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Samsung WB350F
GXR Mount A12 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
WB350F | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2011 | Newer by 29 months |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung WB350F
GXR Mount A12 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR Mount A12 comes with exterior dimensions of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") and a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the GXR Mount A12 against the WB350F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a258/2a258dde548d006add517839517dd87d3505a821" alt="Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR Mount A12 and WB350F is 84 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab611/ab6116fb0717d8192929ee10fe4e28617d1c6d04" alt="Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through specs. The pic below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR Mount A12 and WB350F.
All in all, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GXR Mount A12 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Samsung WB350F will provide you with greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged GXR Mount A12 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18607/186070293f70177aa7308f334b20e42daaa1393b" alt="Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8eba3/8eba31aae51b0b84e1cfe3f516a7a2a92abe3aef" alt="Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung WB350F |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-08-05 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/9000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.60 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 370 gr (0.82 lb) | 276 gr (0.61 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-90 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (5 sec, custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $349 | $260 |