Clicky

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
84
Imaging
53
Features
39
Overall
47
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR Mount A12
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1/9000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
  • Revealed August 2011
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Following is a in depth analysis of the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) and WB35F (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The GXR Mount A12 was released 3 years prior to the WB35F which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the GXR Mount A12 matches up vs the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Samsung WB35F

 GXR Mount A12 WB35F 
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12

 WB35F GXR Mount A12 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014August 2011More modern by 29 months

Common features in the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung WB35F

 GXR Mount A12 WB35F 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR Mount A12 provides outer measurements of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") and a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has specifications of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the GXR Mount A12 versus the WB35F.

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR Mount A12 and WB35F is 84 and 93 respectively.

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Typically, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes merely by going through specs. The image here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR Mount A12 and WB35F.

All in all, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GXR Mount A12 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Samsung WB35F will show greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GXR Mount A12 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Portrait photography features
Samsung WB35F Portrait photography features
55
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
doesn't have liveview
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
37
has manual focus
good MP (16MP)
no manual mode
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GXR Mount A12
Street photography with Samsung WB35F
65
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (194 grams)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sports photography details
Samsung WB35F Sports photography details
39
great max shutter speed (1/9,000 seconds)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
doesn't have liveview
slow fps (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
does not have phase detect auto focus
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Travel photography camera
60
built-in flash
fast maximum aperture (f)
missing Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
70
lighter than competition in class (194 grams)
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
long zoom (288mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Landscape photography camera
52
has manual focus
fast maximum aperture (f)
good sized screen (3")
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse mode
43
has manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Vlogging features
Samsung WB35F Vlogging features
26
fast maximum aperture (f)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external mic socket
31
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (194g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung WB35F
 Ricoh GXR Mount A12Samsung WB35F
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Samsung WB35F
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2011-08-05 2014-01-07
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 370.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 2848 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range () 24-288mm (12.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.1-6.3
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/9000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 9.60 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 370g (0.82 lb) 194g (0.43 lb)
Physical dimensions 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model DB-90 BP70A
Self timer Yes (5 sec, custom) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $349 $130