Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Revealed August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) and WB35F (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GXR Mount A12 was released 3 years prior to the WB35F which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the GXR Mount A12 matches up vs the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR Mount A12 & Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Samsung WB35F
GXR Mount A12 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
WB35F | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | August 2011 | More modern by 29 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung WB35F
GXR Mount A12 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR Mount A12 provides outer measurements of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") and a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has specifications of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the GXR Mount A12 versus the WB35F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR Mount A12 and WB35F is 84 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes merely by going through specs. The image here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR Mount A12 and WB35F.
All in all, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GXR Mount A12 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Samsung WB35F will show greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GXR Mount A12 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung WB35F |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-08-05 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-6.3 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/9000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.60 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 370g (0.82 lb) | 194g (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-90 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (5 sec, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $349 | $130 |