Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB800F
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Announced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung WB800F, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) and WB800F (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GXR Mount A12 was revealed 17 months earlier than the WB800F which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief view of how the GXR Mount A12 matches up against the WB800F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR Mount A12 & Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Samsung WB800F
GXR Mount A12 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
WB800F | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | August 2011 | Fresher by 17 months | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung WB800F
GXR Mount A12 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you should consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR Mount A12 comes with exterior measurements of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") along with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the GXR Mount A12 versus the WB800F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR Mount A12 and WB800F is 84 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to see the difference in sensor sizing only by researching technical specs. The graphic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR Mount A12 and WB800F.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GXR Mount A12 with its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung WB800F will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older GXR Mount A12 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung WB800F |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-08-05 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1s | 16s |
Max shutter speed | 1/9000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.60 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 370g (0.82 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (5 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $349 | $300 |