Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony T900
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Revealed August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony T900 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony T900, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and the T900 (12MP) is very well matched but the GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) and T900 (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GXR Mount A12 was released 2 years later than the T900 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the GXR Mount A12 matches up against the T900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR Mount A12 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Sony T900
GXR Mount A12 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | February 2009 | More recent by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
T900 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 920k | Crisper display (+2k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Sony T900
GXR Mount A12 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has external dimensions of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") along with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony T900 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the GXR Mount A12 against the T900.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the GXR Mount A12 and T900 is 84 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements only by looking at specs. The visual below will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR Mount A12 and T900.
All in all, the two cameras feature the identical resolution but different sensor measurements. The GXR Mount A12 has the larger sensor which will make obtaining shallow DOF simpler. The newer GXR Mount A12 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2011-08-05 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/9000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.60 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 370g (0.82 lb) | 143g (0.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (5 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $349 | $300 |