Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony W320
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27f00/27f002f9b360b27dd43a21dfef0ba4e91344bfbc" alt="Ricoh GXR Mount A12 front Ricoh GXR Mount A12 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66ec3/66ec316340c681a5b653dffd1598d7db3bc6344d" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front"
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony W320 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony W320, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and the W320 (14MP) is relatively similar but the GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) and W320 (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The GXR Mount A12 was released 20 months later than the W320 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the GXR Mount A12 scores versus the W320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony W320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR Mount A12 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery & Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Sony W320
GXR Mount A12 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 20 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
W320 | GXR Mount A12 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Sony W320
GXR Mount A12 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR Mount A12 provides outer measurements of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") and a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Sony W320 has specifications of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony W320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the GXR Mount A12 compared to the W320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a104/4a104fe2b1b5aadd92d983df1260402d81d200d5" alt="Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony W320 size comparison Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony W320 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR Mount A12 and W320 is 84 and 97 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3b01/d3b01fa8bdb3972a5e52db7d39e56ec755ef4f07" alt="Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by reading specs. The visual here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR Mount A12 and W320.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR Mount A12 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Sony W320 will offer more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher GXR Mount A12 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c592/4c5923cceebe0db76bb63706fd551399d335f1f3" alt="Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0ab6/b0ab6640a2bed947b211990be0e501cbb78b65fa" alt="Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Sony W320 Specifications
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2011-08-05 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 4cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/9000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.60 m | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 370 grams (0.82 lb) | 117 grams (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-90 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (5 sec, custom) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $349 | $269 |