Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Ricoh WG-M1
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Released March 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both are sold by Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and WG-M1 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was announced 5 years prior to the WG-M1 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores versus the WG-M1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC & Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Ricoh WG-M1
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 115k | Clearer display (+805k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
WG-M1 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2014 | March 2010 | Newer by 54 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Ricoh WG-M1
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has got exterior dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC compared to the WG-M1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WG-M1 is 85 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WG-M1.
Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh WG-M1 will offer you more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-03-18 | 2014-09-12 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | (1×) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 115k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 shots | 350 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $349 | $2,000 |