Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung EX2F
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Revealed March 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Introduced December 2012
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung EX2F, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/1.7").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was unveiled 3 years before the EX2F which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up versus the EX2F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC & Samsung EX2F. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung EX2F
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 0k | Sharper screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX2F | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | March 2010 | Newer by 33 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung EX2F
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has got outer dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung EX2F has sizing of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung EX2F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC compared to the EX2F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and EX2F is 85 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specifications. The picture below should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and EX2F.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung EX2F to resolve extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung EX2F |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-03-18 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 0k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180 secs | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) | 294 grams (0.65 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $349 | $478 |