Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ10W
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Announced March 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Alternate Name is WB500
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung HZ10W, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the HZ10W (10MP) is pretty well matched but the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and HZ10W (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was launched 11 months later than the HZ10W and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a quick overview of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores against the HZ10W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung HZ10W. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery and Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung HZ10W
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2010 | May 2009 | More recent by 11 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
HZ10W | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung HZ10W
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC enjoys physical measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Samsung HZ10W has specifications of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung HZ10W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs the HZ10W.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and HZ10W is 85 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading through specs. The photograph underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and HZ10W.
All in all, the two cameras feature the identical MP albeit different sensor measurements. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has got the bigger sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field less difficult. The newer GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung HZ10W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung HZ10W |
Other name | - | WB500 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-03-18 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2432 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) | 249 gr (0.55 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $349 | $300 |