Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX300
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Announced March 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Released November 2013
- Superseded the Samsung NX210
- New Model is Samsung NX500
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX300, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and NX300 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was unveiled 4 years prior to the NX300 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick overview of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores vs the NX300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung NX300. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery and Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung NX300
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 768k | Clearer screen (+152k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
NX300 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2013 | March 2010 | Fresher by 44 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung NX300
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has got exterior dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Samsung NX300 has specifications of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX300 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus the NX300.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and NX300 is 85 and 86 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading specs. The visual below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and NX300.
All in all, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Samsung NX300 will offer extra detail having an extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung NX300 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-03-18 | 2013-11-24 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 768 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) | 331 grams (0.73 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 shots | 330 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $349 | $750 |