Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX3000

Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung NX3000 front
Portability
89 Imaging
63 Features
62 Overall
62

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Revealed March 2010
Samsung NX3000
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
  • Introduced May 2014
  • Replaced the Samsung NX2000
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX3000 Overview

Following is a in depth overview of the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX3000, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and NX3000 (20MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and NX3000 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was unveiled 5 years prior to the NX3000 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up against the NX3000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung NX3000

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC NX3000 
Screen resolution920k461kClearer screen (+459k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 NX3000 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
IntroducedMay 2014March 2010More modern by 51 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung NX3000

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC NX3000 
Manual focus  More exact focus
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Selfie screen  No selfie screen
Touch screen  Neither comes with Touch screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC comes with outside measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX3000 has sizing of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX3000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and the NX3000.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX3000 size comparison
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and NX3000 is 85 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX3000 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
In many cases, it is very tough to see the difference between sensor sizes merely by going over specifications. The image below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and NX3000.
Plainly, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Samsung NX3000 will offer you extra detail having an extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be behind in sensor technology.
	
			Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX3000 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography factors
Samsung NX3000 Portrait photography factors
36
 you can focus manually
 exports RAW files
 does not have liveview
 low resolution (10 megapixels)
 small sensor (1/1.7")
77
 manual focus
 good MP (20MP)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 supports face detection focus
 delivers RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Street Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography highlights
Samsung NX3000 Street photography highlights
65
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW files
 lighter than competition in class (355g)
 screen does not articulate
 small sensor (1/1.7")
81
 screen tilts up and down
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 delivers RAW formats
 lighter than competition in class (230g)
 good high ISO (25,600)
 does not have image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sports Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Sports photography camera
 Samsung NX3000 as a Sports photography camera
25
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 does not have liveview
 painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
 low resolution (10MP)
 small sensor (1/1.7")
 has no phase detect auto focus
56
 good MP (20MP)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 supports tracking autofocus
 low fps (5.0 frames per second)
 does not have image stabilization
 lack of phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography highlights
Samsung NX3000 Travel photography highlights
60
 lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
 built-in flash
 relatively wide (24mm)
 low resolution (10 megapixels)
 doesn't have a selfie friendly display
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
68
 lighter than competition in class (230 grams)
 good MP (20MP)
 lack of Timelapse recording
 does not have selfie friendly display
Photography Glossary
Landscape Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography highlights
Samsung NX3000 Landscape photography highlights
47
 you can focus manually
 relatively wide (24mm)
 pretty good screen size (3")
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW files
 cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
 does not have liveview
 low resolution (10MP)
 small sensor (1/1.7")
72
 manual focus
 interchangeable lenses (Samsung NX mount)
 pretty good screen size (3 inch)
 good MP (20 megapixels)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 good high ISO (25,600)
 delivers RAW formats
 does not have image stabilization
 lack of Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging details
Samsung NX3000 Vlogging details
28
 relatively wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
 doesn't have a selfie friendly display
 video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
 lack of external mic socket
34
 supports face detection focus
 great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than competition in class (230 grams)
 does not have selfie friendly display
 does not have image stabilization
 lack of external microphone jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung NX3000
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung NX3000
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung NX3000
Category Advanced Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2010-03-18 2014-05-26
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 3200 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Touch to focus    
Continuous AF    
AF single    
Tracking AF    
Selective AF    
AF center weighted    
AF multi area    
AF live view    
Face detect focusing    
Contract detect focusing    
Phase detect focusing    
Total focus points - 35
Cross type focus points - 1
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Samsung NX
Lens zoom range 24-72mm (3.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.5-4.4 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Number of lenses - 32
Crop factor 4.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 920k dot 461k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch display    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 180s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance 4.50 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual no built-in flash
External flash    
Auto exposure bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 355 gr (0.78 lbs) 230 gr (0.51 lbs)
Dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 photographs 370 photographs
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - B740
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (2-30 sec)
Time lapse recording    
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Retail pricing $349 $897