Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung PL200
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Announced March 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced July 2010
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung PL200, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and PL200 (14MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and PL200 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was launched 4 months prior to the PL200 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung PL200 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up vs the PL200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung PL200. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery and Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung PL200
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
PL200 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung PL200
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2010 | July 2010 | Similar generation | |
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC features outside measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Samsung PL200 has measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung PL200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and the PL200.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and PL200 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by looking at specifications. The photograph here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and PL200.
Plainly, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung PL200 will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung PL200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung PL200 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-03-18 | 2010-07-21 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) | 170 grams (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $349 | $0 |