Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL102
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Released March 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Also referred to as ES55
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL102 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung SL102, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is fairly close but the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and SL102 (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was manufactured 15 months after the SL102 making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores versus the SL102 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung SL102
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2010 | January 2009 | Newer by 15 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
SL102 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung SL102
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC provides exterior measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung SL102 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs the SL102.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and SL102 is 85 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by researching technical specs. The pic underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and SL102.
As you can tell, both of these cameras provide the same megapixels but different sensor dimensions. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC uses the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field less difficult. The more recent GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung SL102 |
Also called as | - | ES55 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-03-18 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 lbs) | 116 grams (0.26 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $349 | $130 |