Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL102

Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung SL102 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Released March 2010
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Released January 2009
  • Also referred to as ES55
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL102 Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung SL102, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is fairly close but the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and SL102 (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was manufactured 15 months after the SL102 making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores versus the SL102 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung SL102

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC SL102 
ReleasedMarch 2010January 2009Newer by 15 months
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 SL102 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 

Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung SL102

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC SL102 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC provides exterior measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Check the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung SL102 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs the SL102.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL102 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and SL102 is 85 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by researching technical specs. The pic underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and SL102.

As you can tell, both of these cameras provide the same megapixels but different sensor dimensions. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC uses the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field less difficult. The more recent GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC should have an advantage in sensor tech.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography highlights
Samsung SL102 Portrait photography highlights
36
focusing manually
supports RAW files
no liveview feature
MP count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
25
comes with face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Street photography with Samsung SL102
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
lighter than competition (355 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
55
lighter than competition (116 grams)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Sports photography with Samsung SL102
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no liveview feature
low fps (2.0 frames per second)
MP count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
no phase detect auto focus
16
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Travel photography with Samsung SL102
60
lighter than competition (355g)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
MP count low (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
62
lighter than competition (116g)
has built in flash
great max aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
resolution not great (10MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (35mm)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Landscape photography with Samsung SL102
47
focusing manually
decently wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
MP count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
27
great max aperture (f)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Vlogging with Samsung SL102
28
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (355g)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have microphone port
30
great max aperture (f)
comes with face detection focus
lighter than competition (116g)
wide angle not good (35mm)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external mic support
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL102 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung SL102
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung SL102
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung SL102
Also called as - ES55
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2010-03-18 2009-01-08
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-72mm (3.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.5-4.4 -
Macro focus distance 1cm 10cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.5 inch
Display resolution 920 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 180 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.50 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 355 grams (0.78 lbs) 116 grams (0.26 lbs)
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 photos -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $349 $130