Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Released March 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Also referred to as PL50
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is relatively similar but the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and SL202 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was introduced 14 months after the SL202 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC grades vs the SL202 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC & Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung SL202
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2010 | February 2009 | Newer by 14 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
SL202 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung SL202
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC comes with outside measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and the SL202.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and SL202 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading specs. The image underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and SL202.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have the same resolution albeit different sensor dimensions. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has got the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF less difficult. The more modern GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung SL202 |
Alternate name | - | PL50 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-03-18 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.50 m | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $349 | $140 |