Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202

Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Released March 2010
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Announced February 2009
  • Also referred to as PL50
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202 Overview

Lets look a bit more closely at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is relatively similar but the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and SL202 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was introduced 14 months after the SL202 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC grades vs the SL202 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung SL202

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC SL202 
AnnouncedMarch 2010February 2009Newer by 14 months
Focus manually  Very precise focus
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 SL202 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung SL202

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC SL202 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  No Touch friendly screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC comes with outside measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and the SL202.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202 size comparison
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and SL202 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Usually, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading specs. The image underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and SL202.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have the same resolution albeit different sensor dimensions. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has got the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF less difficult. The more modern GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
	
			Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Portrait photography camera
 Samsung SL202 as a Portrait photography camera
36
 manual focus
 exports RAW formats
 no liveview
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 small sensor (1/1.7")
25
 includes face detect autofocus
 no manual focus
 no manual control
 external flash not possible
 megapixel count low (10MP)
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Street Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Street photography camera
 Samsung SL202 as a Street photography camera
65
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW formats
 lighter than competition in class (355g)
 fixed screen
 small sensor (1/1.7")
47
 no articulating screen
 does not have image stabilization
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography features
Samsung SL202 Sports photography features
25
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview
 painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 small sensor (1/1.7")
 does not have phase detect auto focus
16
 no shutter priority
 does not have image stabilization
 megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Travel Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Travel photography camera
 Samsung SL202 as a Travel photography camera
60
 lighter than competition in class (355g)
 flash built-in
 pretty wide (24mm)
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
57
 built-in flash
 relatively wide (28mm)
 doesn't have Time Lapse recording
 megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
 display is not selfie friendly
 slow max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Landscape photography with Samsung SL202
47
 manual focus
 pretty wide (24mm)
 screen is a decent size (3 inches)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW formats
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 small sensor (1/1.7")
27
 relatively wide (28mm)
 no manual focus
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f2.8)
 tiny screen (2.7 inch)
 no manual control
 does not have image stabilization
 megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
 doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Vlogging Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Vlogging camera
 Samsung SL202 as a Vlogging camera
28
 pretty wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
 does not have microphone socket
27
 relatively wide (28mm)
 includes face detect autofocus
 slow max aperture (f2.8)
 display is not selfie friendly
 does not have image stabilization
 low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
 doesn't have mic port
Photography Glossary
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung SL202
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung SL202
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung SL202
Alternate name - PL50
Category Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2010-03-18 2009-02-17
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3 and  16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Autofocus touch    
Continuous autofocus    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Autofocus center weighted    
Autofocus multi area    
Live view autofocus    
Face detect focus    
Contract detect focus    
Phase detect focus    
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-72mm (3.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focusing distance 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 920k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch operation    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 180 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance 4.50 m 4.60 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe    
AEB    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 355 grams (0.78 lbs) 168 grams (0.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes
Time lapse recording    
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $349 $140