Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST150F

Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung ST150F front
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Released March 2010
Samsung ST150F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
  • 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
  • Announced January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST150F Overview

The following is a extensive comparison of the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST150F, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and ST150F (16MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and ST150F (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was released 3 years prior to the ST150F which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung ST150F being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up versus the ST150F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung ST150F

          

          

            
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC ST150F 
Focus manually  More exact focusing
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

          

          

            
 ST150F GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013March 2010Newer by 34 months
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung ST150F

          

          

            
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC ST150F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Selfie screen  Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Neither comes with Touch friendly display
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison

          

          

            
If you are going to travel with your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC comes with outer dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung ST150F has specifications of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST150F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC compared to the ST150F.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST150F size comparison
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and ST150F is 85 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST150F top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
More often than not, it is hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing a spec sheet. The image here may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and ST150F.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung ST150F will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

            Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST150F sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Photography Glossary        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Portrait photography camera
 Samsung ST150F as a Portrait photography camera
36
 has manual focus
 supports RAW files
 doesn't have liveview
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is small (1/1.7")
34
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 provides face detect autofocus
 no manual focus
 manual exposure not possible
 can't use external flash
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Street Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography factors
Samsung ST150F Street photography factors
65
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports RAW files
 lighter than competitors (355g)
 screen does not articulate
 sensor size is small (1/1.7")
56
 lighter than others (114 grams)
 screen does not articulate
 lack of image stabilization
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography factors
Samsung ST150F Sports photography factors
25
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 doesn't have liveview
 continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames/s)
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is small (1/1.7")
 does not have phase detect autofocus
36
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 provides tracking focus
 lack of shutter priority mode
 lack of image stabilization
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography details
Samsung ST150F Travel photography details
60
 lighter than competitors (355 grams)
 built-in flash
 fairly wide (24mm)
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 does not feature selfie friendly display
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
69
 lighter than others (114g)
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 built-in flash
 really wide (25mm)
 lack of Timelapse function
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Landscape Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography factors
Samsung ST150F Landscape photography factors
47
 has manual focus
 fairly wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports RAW files
 cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
 doesn't have liveview
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 sensor size is small (1/1.7")
38
 really wide (25mm)
 screen is a decent size (3")
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 no manual focus
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
 manual exposure not possible
 lack of image stabilization
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
 lack of Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Vlogging with Samsung ST150F
28
 fairly wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competitors (355g)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
 does not feature selfie friendly display
 video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
 lack of external microphone port
30
 really wide (25mm)
 provides face detect autofocus
 lighter than others (114 grams)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 lack of image stabilization
 low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
 lack of microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
        
                
        

          

            
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST150F Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung ST150F
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung ST150F
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung ST150F
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2010-03-18 2013-01-07
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch focus    
Continuous AF    
Single AF    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
AF multi area    
Live view AF    
Face detection AF    
Contract detection AF    
Phase detection AF    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-72mm (3.0x) 25-125mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/2.5-6.3
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch capability    
Screen tech - QVGA TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 180 secs 1 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash range 4.50 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 355 grams (0.78 lb) 114 grams (0.25 lb)
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 photographs -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes
Time lapse shooting    
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $349 $300