Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST600

Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung ST600 front
Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST600 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Introduced March 2010
Samsung ST600
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-135mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 150g - 104 x 60 x 20mm
  • Launched January 2010
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST600 Overview

Following is a extended comparison of the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung ST600, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and ST600 (14MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and ST600 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was announced 3 months after the ST600 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung ST600 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going right into a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC grades vs the ST600 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung ST600

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC ST600 
Manual focus  Dial accurate focus
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung ST600 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 ST600 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Display dimensions3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1152k920kCrisper display (+232k dot)
Touch display  Easily navigate
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung ST600

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC ST600 
LaunchedMarch 2010January 2010Same age
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen  Neither contains selfie screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST600 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has got outer dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST600 has measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung ST600 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs the ST600.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST600 size comparison
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and ST600 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST600 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST600 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Usually, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes purely by checking out technical specs. The pic underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and ST600.
As you can tell, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC having a larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung ST600 will produce more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively.
	
			Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST600 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST600 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST600 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Portrait photography with Samsung ST600
36
 has manual focus
 delivers RAW formats
 no liveview
 megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
 small sensor size (1/1.7")
29
 decent MP (14 megapixels)
 manual focus not available
 cannot use external flash
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Street Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography features
Samsung ST600 Street photography features
65
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW formats
 lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
 screen does not articulate
 small sensor size (1/1.7")
60
 image stabilization (Optical)
 provides touch focus
 screen is fixed
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
 heavier than competition (150 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography factors
Samsung ST600 Sports photography factors
25
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview
 continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
 megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
 small sensor size (1/1.7")
 does not have phase detect AF
43
 image stabilization (Optical)
 decent MP (14 megapixels)
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Travel Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Travel photography camera
 Samsung ST600 as a Travel photography camera
60
 lighter than competition in class (355g)
 built-in flash
 fairly wide (24mm)
 megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
 display is not selfie friendly
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
65
 provides touch focus
 decent MP (14MP)
 built-in flash
 really wide (27mm)
 lack of Time Lapse mode
 heavier than competition (150g)
 doesn't have selfie friendly screen
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Landscape Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography factors
Samsung ST600 Landscape photography factors
47
 has manual focus
 fairly wide (24mm)
 nice screen size (3")
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW formats
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview
 megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
 small sensor size (1/1.7")
43
 really wide (27mm)
 very good size screen (3.5 inches)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 decent MP (14 megapixels)
 manual focus not available
 cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
 lack of Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging info
Samsung ST600 Vlogging info
28
 fairly wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition in class (355g)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
 display is not selfie friendly
 low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
 missing external mic port
30
 really wide (27mm)
 touchscreen
 image stabilization (Optical)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
 doesn't have selfie friendly screen
 low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
 lack of mic port
 heavier than competition (150 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST600 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung ST600
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung ST600
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung ST600
Type Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Introduced 2010-03-18 2010-01-06
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 3200 4800
Maximum boosted ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch focus    
AF continuous    
Single AF    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-72mm (3.0x) 27-135mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/3.3-5.5
Macro focus distance 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3.5 inch
Resolution of screen 920k dot 1,152k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch screen    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 180s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range 4.50 m 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 355 gr (0.78 pounds) 150 gr (0.33 pounds)
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 104 x 60 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model - SLB07
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse feature    
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $349 $330