Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST65
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Announced March 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST65 Overview
Below is a comprehensive comparison of the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung ST65, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and ST65 (14MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and ST65 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was unveiled 10 months prior to the ST65 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores vs the ST65 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung ST65. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery and Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung ST65
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
ST65 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | March 2010 | More recent by 10 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung ST65
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC provides outer dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung ST65 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC compared to the ST65.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and ST65 is 85 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The visual below might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and ST65.
All in all, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Samsung ST65 will result in greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung ST65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung ST65 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-03-18 | 2011-01-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | () |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.50 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355g (0.78 lbs) | - |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $349 | $130 |