Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST65

Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Announced March 2010
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST65 Overview

Below is a comprehensive comparison of the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung ST65, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and ST65 (14MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and ST65 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was unveiled 10 months prior to the ST65 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores vs the ST65 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung ST65

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC ST65 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Display resolution920k460kSharper display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 ST65 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011March 2010More recent by 10 months

Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung ST65

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC ST65 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC provides outer dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung ST65 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC compared to the ST65.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and ST65 is 85 and 99 respectively.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The visual below might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and ST65.

All in all, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Samsung ST65 will result in greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography factors
Samsung ST65 Portrait photography factors
36
you can focus manually
saves RAW formats
no liveview
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
28
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Street photography camera
Samsung ST65 as a Street photography camera
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
lighter than competition (355g)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
49
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
low maximum ISO (0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography details
Samsung ST65 Sports photography details
25
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no liveview
max fps very slow (2.0 fps)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
has no phase detect autofocus
26
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography factors
Samsung ST65 Travel photography factors
60
lighter than competition (355g)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
71
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
very good max aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse function
does not feature selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography information
Samsung ST65 Landscape photography information
47
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
37
very good max aperture (f)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
no manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
manual mode not available
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (0)
has no RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging factors
Samsung ST65 Vlogging factors
28
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (355g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone support
27
very good max aperture (f)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung ST65
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung ST65
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung ST65
Class Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Announced 2010-03-18 2011-01-19
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 -
Lowest native ISO 100 -
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-72mm (3.0x) ()
Maximal aperture f/2.5-4.4 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 920 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 180s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 2.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.50 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 355g (0.78 lbs) -
Dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 photos -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) -
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal -
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $349 $130