Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95

Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
19
Overall
31

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Released March 2010
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95 Overview

Here, we will be contrasting the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and ST95 (16MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and ST95 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was released 10 months before the ST95 which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up vs the ST95 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung ST95

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC ST95 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 ST95 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
LaunchedJanuary 2011March 2010More modern by 10 months

Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung ST95

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC ST95 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has physical measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung ST95 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC against the ST95.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and ST95 is 85 and 99 respectively.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and ST95.

Clearly, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung ST95 will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Portrait photography with Samsung ST95
36
you can focus manually
supports RAW files
doesn't have liveview
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
30
resolution is good (16MP)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Street photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Street photography camera
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
lighter than average in class (355g)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
50
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
low max ISO (0)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Sports photography with Samsung ST95
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't have liveview
max frames per second very slow (2.0 frames/s)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
27
resolution is good (16MP)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography features
Samsung ST95 Travel photography features
60
lighter than average in class (355g)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.5)
71
resolution is good (16MP)
flash built-in
fast maximum aperture (f)
no Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography info
Samsung ST95 Landscape photography info
47
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have liveview
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
38
fast maximum aperture (f)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
lack of RAW format
no Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging details
Samsung ST95 Vlogging details
28
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (355g)
slow max aperture (f2.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external mic jack
27
fast maximum aperture (f)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung ST95
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung ST95
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung ST95
Type Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Released 2010-03-18 2011-01-19
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 -
Lowest native ISO 100 -
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-72mm (3.0x) ()
Max aperture f/2.5-4.4 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 180s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.50 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 355 gr (0.78 lbs) -
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 images -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal -
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $349 $145