Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Released March 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and ST95 (16MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and ST95 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was released 10 months before the ST95 which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up vs the ST95 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung ST95. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery and Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung ST95
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
ST95 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | March 2010 | More modern by 10 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung ST95
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has physical measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung ST95 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC against the ST95.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and ST95 is 85 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and ST95.
Clearly, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung ST95 will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung ST95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung ST95 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2010-03-18 | 2011-01-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | () |
Max aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.50 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lbs) | - |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $349 | $145 |