Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL225

Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung TL225 front
Portability
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Revealed March 2010
Samsung TL225
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
  • Released August 2009
  • Additionally referred to as ST550
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL225 Overview

Lets take a more detailed look at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL225, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is relatively similar but the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and TL225 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was brought out 8 months after the TL225 so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores versus the TL225 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung TL225

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC TL225 
ReleasedMarch 2010August 2009More modern by 8 months
Manually focus  Very accurate focusing
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 TL225 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Screen sizing3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1152k920kClearer screen (+232k dot)
Touch friendly screen  Quickly navigate
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung TL225

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC TL225 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Absent selfie screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC enjoys external measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung TL225 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL225 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus the TL225.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL225 size comparison
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and TL225 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL225 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Usually, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over a spec sheet. The picture here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and TL225.
Clearly, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Samsung TL225 will deliver extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC should have an edge in sensor tech.
	
			Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL225 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL225 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Portrait photography with Samsung TL225
36
 manual focus
 exports RAW formats
 doesn't have liveview
 low resolution sensor (10MP)
 sensor  is tiny (1/1.7")
21
 focusing manually not possible
 manual mode not possible
 cannot use external flash
 MP count low (12 megapixels)
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Street Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography information
Samsung TL225 Street photography information
65
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW formats
 lighter than competitors (355 grams)
 screen does not articulate
 sensor  is tiny (1/1.7")
59
 image stabilization (Optical)
 features touch to focus
 fixed screen
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
 more heavy than competition in class (187g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Sports photography with Samsung TL225
25
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 doesn't have liveview
 slow fps (2.0 frames/s)
 low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
 sensor  is tiny (1/1.7")
 does not have phase detect autofocus
27
 image stabilization (Optical)
 no shutter priority
 MP count low (12 megapixels)
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary
Travel Comparison
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Travel photography with Samsung TL225
60
 lighter than competitors (355 grams)
 flash built-in
 pretty wide (24mm)
 low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
59
 features touch to focus
 built-in flash
 reasonably wide (27mm)
 no Timelapse function
 more heavy than competition in class (187 grams)
 MP count low (12 megapixels)
 doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Landscape Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Landscape photography camera
 Samsung TL225 as a Landscape photography camera
47
 manual focus
 pretty wide (24mm)
 nice screen size (3")
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW formats
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
 doesn't have liveview
 low resolution sensor (10MP)
 sensor  is tiny (1/1.7")
37
 reasonably wide (27mm)
 big screen (3.5 inch)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 focusing manually not possible
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 manual mode not possible
 MP count low (12MP)
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
 no Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Vlogging with Samsung TL225
28
 pretty wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competitors (355 grams)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
 no microphone support
29
 reasonably wide (27mm)
 has touchscreen
 image stabilization (Optical)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
 low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
 no microphone socket
 more heavy than competition in class (187g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL225 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung TL225
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung TL225
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung TL225
Otherwise known as - ST550
Type Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Revealed 2010-03-18 2009-08-13
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW images    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch to focus    
Continuous autofocus    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Autofocus center weighted    
Autofocus multi area    
Autofocus live view    
Face detection focus    
Contract detection focus    
Phase detection focus    
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-72mm (3.0x) 27-124mm (4.6x)
Maximal aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/3.5-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3.5 inches
Resolution of screen 920k dots 1,152k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch friendly    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 180 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash distance 4.50 m 3.40 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual
External flash    
AEB    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 355 gr (0.78 pounds) 187 gr (0.41 pounds)
Dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 photographs -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID - SLB-07A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch price $349 $488