Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL240

Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung TL240 front
Portability
95 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Revealed March 2010
Samsung TL240
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 4800 (Push to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
  • Announced January 2010
  • Additionally referred to as ST5000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL240 Overview

Following is a comprehensive review of the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung TL240, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and TL240 (14MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and TL240 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was launched 3 months after the TL240 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC grades against the TL240 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung TL240

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC TL240 
Manual focus  Very exact focusing
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 TL240 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Display dimension3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Touch friendly display  Easily navigate
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung TL240

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC TL240 
AnnouncedMarch 2010January 2010Similar age
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen  Missing selfie screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
In case you're intending to carry around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC features external measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung TL240 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC compared to the TL240.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL240 size comparison
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and TL240 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL240 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Normally, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at specs. The image here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and TL240.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Samsung TL240 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively.
	
			Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL240 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Photography Glossary	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography advice
Samsung TL240 Portrait photography advice
36
 focusing manually
 saves RAW files
 no liveview
 low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
28
 good megapixels (14 megapixels)
 no manual focus
 lack of manual mode
 can't use external flash
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Street Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Street photography camera
 Samsung TL240 as a Street photography camera
65
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 saves RAW files
 lighter than others in class (355 grams)
 no moving screen
 sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
60
 image stabilization (Optical)
 boasts focus by touch
 no articulating screen
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
 more heavy than competition in class (160 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography info
Samsung TL240 Sports photography info
25
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview
 slow fps (2.0 fps)
 low resolution sensor (10MP)
 sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
 doesn't have phase detect auto focus
43
 image stabilization (Optical)
 good megapixels (14 megapixels)
 offers tracking autofocus
 no shutter priority
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography information
Samsung TL240 Travel photography information
60
 lighter than others in class (355g)
 built-in flash
 pretty wide (24mm)
 low resolution sensor (10MP)
 doesn't have selfie friendly screen
 slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
60
 boasts focus by touch
 good megapixels (14 megapixels)
 built-in flash
 missing Timelapse mode
 more heavy than competition in class (160 grams)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 wide angle not great (31mm)
 slow max aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Landscape Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography info
Samsung TL240 Landscape photography info
47
 focusing manually
 pretty wide (24mm)
 screen is a decent size (3 inch)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 saves RAW files
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview
 low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
37
 very good size screen (3.5")
 image stabilization (Optical)
 good megapixels (14MP)
 no manual focus
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 wide angle not great (31mm)
 slow max aperture (f3.3)
 lack of manual mode
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
 missing Timelapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging advice
Samsung TL240 Vlogging advice
28
 pretty wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than others in class (355 grams)
 slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
 doesn't have selfie friendly screen
 low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
 missing external microphone jack
27
 built-in touchscreen
 image stabilization (Optical)
 wide angle not great (31mm)
 slow max aperture (f3.3)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
 missing external microphone port
 more heavy than competition in class (160 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL240 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung TL240
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung TL240
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung TL240
Also called as - ST5000
Class Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Revealed 2010-03-18 2010-01-06
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4334 x 3256
Max native ISO 3200 4800
Max enhanced ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW images    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch to focus    
AF continuous    
AF single    
AF tracking    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detect AF    
Contract detect AF    
Phase detect AF    
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-72mm (3.0x) 31-217mm (7.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/3.3-5.5
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3.5"
Resolution of display 920k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 180 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1500 secs
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash range 4.50 m 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 355 gr (0.78 lbs) 160 gr (0.35 lbs)
Dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 shots -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model - SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse recording    
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $349 $171