Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL320

Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung TL320 front
Portability
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Announced March 2010
Samsung TL320
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
  • n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Other Name is WB1000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL320 Overview

Here is a detailed comparison of the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung TL320, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and TL320 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was released 13 months later than the TL320 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go through a full comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC grades against the TL320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung TL320

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC TL320 
LaunchedMarch 2010February 2009Fresher by 13 months
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 TL320 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung TL320

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC TL320 
Manual focus  More accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurement
Selfie screen  Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen  Lack of Touch screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you're going to carry your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has got exterior dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung TL320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC against the TL320.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL320 size comparison
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and TL320 is 85 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
More often than not, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by looking at technical specs. The visual underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and TL320.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Samsung TL320 will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The more modern GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC provides an advantage in sensor technology.
	
			Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Photography Glossary	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography info
Samsung TL320 Portrait photography info
36
 manual focus
 saves RAW files
 no liveview feature
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 tiny sensor (1/1.7")
34
 manual focus
 includes face detect focusing
 can't use external flash
 megapixel count low (12MP)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Street Comparison
Street photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Street photography with Samsung TL320
65
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 saves RAW files
 lighter than competition (355 grams)
 no articulating screen
 tiny sensor (1/1.7")
58
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 screen is fixed
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography advice
Samsung TL320 Sports photography advice
25
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview feature
 painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 tiny sensor (1/1.7")
 doesn't have phase detect autofocus
30
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography info
Samsung TL320 Travel photography info
60
 lighter than competition (355g)
 built-in flash
 rather wide (24mm)
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
59
 has built in flash
 really wide (24mm)
 no Time Lapse recording
 megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
 doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Landscape Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography factors
Samsung TL320 Landscape photography factors
47
 manual focus
 rather wide (24mm)
 screen size is decent (3 inch)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 saves RAW files
 cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview feature
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 tiny sensor (1/1.7")
43
 manual focus
 really wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3 inch)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
 megapixel count low (12MP)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
 no Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Vlogging Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Vlogging camera
 Samsung TL320 as a Vlogging camera
28
 rather wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition (355g)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
 missing external mic support
31
 really wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 includes face detect focusing
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
 doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
 video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
 no mic support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL320 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung TL320
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung TL320
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung TL320
Also called as - WB1000
Class Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Announced 2010-03-18 2009-02-23
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 16:9, 4:3 and  3:2
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
AF touch    
AF continuous    
Single AF    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detection AF    
Contract detection AF    
Phase detection AF    
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-72mm (3.0x) 24-120mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/2.8-5.8
Macro focus distance 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch friendly    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 180s 16s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 2.0fps -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash range 4.50 m 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 355g (0.78 lb) -
Dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 images -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature    
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $349 $380