Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL350

Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung TL350 front
Portability
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Launched March 2010
Samsung TL350
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
  • 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
  • Introduced February 2010
  • Also referred to as WB2000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL350 Overview

Let's look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung TL350, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the TL350 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and TL350 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was revealed at a similar time to the TL350 so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL350 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a short overview of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores against the TL350 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung TL350

          

          

            
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC TL350 
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

          

          

            
 TL350 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung TL350

          

          

            
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC TL350 
IntroducedMarch 2010February 2010Same age
Manual focus  More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurements
Screen resolution920k920kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen  Neither offers selfie screen
Touch screen  Lack of Touch screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC offers outer measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Samsung TL350 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung TL350 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and the TL350.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL350 size comparison
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and TL350 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Quite often, its tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes simply by checking out technical specs. The image underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and TL350.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have the same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizes. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC includes the bigger sensor which will make getting shallower depth of field simpler.

            Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography details
Samsung TL350 Portrait photography details
36
 manual focus
 supports RAW files
 no liveview feature
 low MP (10MP)
 tiny sensor (1/1.7")
35
 manual focus
 delivers RAW files
 no external flash support
 megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Street Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Street photography camera
 Samsung TL350 as a Street photography camera
65
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports RAW files
 lighter than competitors in class (355 grams)
 no moving screen
 tiny sensor (1/1.7")
65
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 delivers RAW files
 screen is fixed
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography information
Samsung TL350 Sports photography information
25
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview feature
 very slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
 low MP (10 megapixels)
 tiny sensor (1/1.7")
 no phase detect AF
29
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count low (10MP)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography information
Samsung TL350 Travel photography information
60
 lighter than competitors in class (355g)
 flash built-in
 decently wide (24mm)
 low MP (10MP)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
60
 flash built-in
 rather wide (24mm)
 megapixel count low (10MP)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 slow max aperture (f2.4)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Landscape photography with Samsung TL350
47
 manual focus
 decently wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3")
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports RAW files
 cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview feature
 low MP (10MP)
 tiny sensor (1/1.7")
50
 manual focus
 rather wide (24mm)
 pretty good screen size (3")
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 delivers RAW files
 cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f2.4)
 megapixel count low (10MP)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Vlogging with Samsung TL350
28
 decently wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competitors in class (355 grams)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
 lack of microphone support
32
 rather wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 slow max aperture (f2.4)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 lack of microphone support
Photography Glossary
        
                
        

          

            
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL350 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung TL350
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung TL350
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung TL350
Also called as - WB2000
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-03-18 2010-02-20
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3 and  16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Autofocus touch    
Continuous autofocus    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Center weighted autofocus    
Autofocus multi area    
Live view autofocus    
Face detection focus    
Contract detection focus    
Phase detection focus    
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-72mm (3.0x) 24-120mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/2.4-5.8
Macro focus range 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 920k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch screen    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 180s 16s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 2.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range 4.50 m 5.20 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual
Hot shoe    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 355 gr (0.78 pounds) 195 gr (0.43 pounds)
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model - SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC, internal
Card slots One One
Cost at release $349 $400