Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB1100F
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Revealed March 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Released January 2014
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB1100F, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and WB1100F (16MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and WB1100F (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was announced 4 years before the WB1100F and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC grades against the WB1100F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC & Samsung WB1100F. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery & Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung WB1100F
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WB1100F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
WB1100F | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | March 2010 | More recent by 46 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB1100F
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WB1100F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC comes with physical measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung WB1100F has measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") accompanied by a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB1100F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and the WB1100F.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB1100F is 85 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB1100F.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB1100F will offer greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung WB1100F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung WB1100F |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-03-18 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.50 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 lb) | 512 grams (1.13 lb) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $349 | $250 |