Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB1100F

Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung WB1100F front
Portability
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Revealed March 2010
Samsung WB1100F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
  • Released January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB1100F Overview

Below, we will be comparing the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB1100F, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and WB1100F (16MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and WB1100F (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was announced 4 years before the WB1100F and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC grades against the WB1100F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung WB1100F

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC WB1100F 
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 WB1100F GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
ReleasedJanuary 2014March 2010More recent by 46 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB1100F

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC WB1100F 
Manually focus  More precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions
Selfie screen  Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Neither comes with Touch friendly screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC comes with physical measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung WB1100F has measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") accompanied by a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB1100F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and the WB1100F.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB1100F size comparison
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB1100F is 85 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB1100F top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Usually, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB1100F.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB1100F will offer greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be behind in sensor tech.
	
			Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB1100F sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography information
Samsung WB1100F Portrait photography information
36
 has manual focus
 delivers RAW formats
 doesn't have liveview
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
37
 has manual focus
 good MP (16MP)
 manual mode not possible
 cannot use external flash
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Street Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Street photography camera
 Samsung WB1100F as a Street photography camera
65
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW formats
 lighter than competitors (355 grams)
 no articulating screen
 sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
44
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 screen is fixed
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
 more heavy than average (512 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography info
Samsung WB1100F Sports photography info
25
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 doesn't have liveview
 painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
 does not have phase detect autofocus
45
 excellent zoom range (25-875mm  35.0 x zoom)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 good MP (16 megapixels)
 slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography details
Samsung WB1100F Travel photography details
60
 lighter than competitors (355 grams)
 flash built-in
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
54
 good MP (16 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 fairly wide (25mm)
 great reach (875mm)
 no Timelapse recording
 more heavy than average (512 grams)
 display is not selfie friendly
 slow max aperture (f3.0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Landscape photography with Samsung WB1100F
47
 has manual focus
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 nice screen size (3 inch)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW formats
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
 doesn't have liveview
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
45
 has manual focus
 fairly wide (25mm)
 good sized screen (3 inch)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 good MP (16MP)
 can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f3.0)
 manual mode not possible
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
 no Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging factors
Samsung WB1100F Vlogging factors
28
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competitors (355g)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
 no microphone port
23
 fairly wide (25mm)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 slow max aperture (f3.0)
 display is not selfie friendly
 video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
 no microphone socket
 more heavy than average (512g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB1100F
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung WB1100F
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung WB1100F
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-03-18 2014-01-07
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3 and  16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch focus    
Autofocus continuous    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Autofocus center weighted    
Multi area autofocus    
Autofocus live view    
Face detect focus    
Contract detect focus    
Phase detect focus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-72mm (3.0x) 25-875mm (35.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch screen    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 180 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 2.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash distance 4.50 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
External flash    
Auto exposure bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 355 grams (0.78 lb) 512 grams (1.13 lb)
Dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 shots -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) -
Time lapse shooting    
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD, SDHC, SDXC
Card slots One One
Cost at release $349 $250