Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB150F
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19064/19064172b06e5d452c23117f62fb823105c4f36b" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/999d5/999d5267cbeeded12e1c296ab2c2e623b4be3f06" alt="Samsung WB150F front Samsung WB150F front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Announced March 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Here, we are matching up the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB150F, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and WB150F (14MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and WB150F (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was introduced 22 months before the WB150F making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summation of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC grades versus the WB150F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC & Samsung WB150F. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung WB150F
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
WB150F | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | ![]() | March 2010 | More modern by 22 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB150F
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC features exterior dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Samsung WB150F has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB150F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs the WB150F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/653c6/653c6883ce39bba05342be08e534b4948ef045cb" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB150F size comparison Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB150F size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB150F is 85 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b8ea/8b8eae7a8cfa503c1a11fcc3c30f13d23f32a3d4" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes simply by checking out specs. The pic underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB150F.
All in all, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC having a larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung WB150F will show greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/530fb/530fb9e0140dae8f669ae14b55493ff2dbadbe68" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57972/579725e6f50bb3613cd9922ba7ec6017acdb3737" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung WB150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung WB150F |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-03-18 | 2012-01-09 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180 secs | 16 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.50 m | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) | 188 gr (0.41 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $349 | $230 |