Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB210

Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung WB210 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
45
Overall
40

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Announced March 2010
Samsung WB210
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
  • 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
  • Announced July 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB210 Overview

Here, we are comparing the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung WB210, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and WB210 (14MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and WB210 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was released 16 months earlier than the WB210 making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up versus the WB210 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung WB210

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC WB210 
Display resolution920k1kSharper display (+919k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 WB210 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
AnnouncedJuly 2011March 2010More modern by 16 months
Display size3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB210

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC WB210 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC features physical dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung WB210 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC compared to the WB210.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB210 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB210 is 85 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB210 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes simply by checking specs. The picture below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB210.

All in all, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung WB210 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB210 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography details
Samsung WB210 Portrait photography details
36
has manual focus
supports RAW files
no liveview
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
39
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (14MP)
features face detect autofocus
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography highlights
Samsung WB210 Street photography highlights
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
lighter than competitors in class (355g)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
66
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides touch to focus
lighter than others (174 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography factors
Samsung WB210 Sports photography factors
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect AF
38
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography info
Samsung WB210 Travel photography info
60
lighter than competitors in class (355g)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
71
lighter than others (174g)
provides touch to focus
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great zoom (288mm)
no Timelapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB210 Landscape photography factors
47
has manual focus
really wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
46
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
lovely big screen (3.5 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
manual mode not available
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging advice
Samsung WB210 Vlogging advice
28
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (355 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
missing mic jack
33
reasonably wide (24mm)
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
lighter than others (174g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB210 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB210
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung WB210
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung WB210
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2010-03-18 2011-07-19
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Max enhanced ISO - 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-72mm (3.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/2.9-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3.5 inches
Screen resolution 920k dot 1k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 180 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.50 m 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 355 gr (0.78 lb) 174 gr (0.38 lb)
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal microSC/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $349 $279