Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB210
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Announced March 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced July 2011
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung WB210, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and WB210 (14MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and WB210 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was released 16 months earlier than the WB210 making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up versus the WB210 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB210. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung WB210
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 1k | Sharper display (+919k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
WB210 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2011 | March 2010 | More modern by 16 months | |
Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB210
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC features physical dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Samsung WB210 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC compared to the WB210.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB210 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes simply by checking specs. The picture below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB210.
All in all, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung WB210 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung WB210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung WB210 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-03-18 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/2.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 1k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lb) | 174 gr (0.38 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $349 | $279 |