Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F

Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung WB2200F front
Portability
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Revealed March 2010
Samsung WB2200F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F Overview

Its time to look closer at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and WB2200F (16MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and WB2200F (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was released 4 years earlier than the WB2200F and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC grades against the WB2200F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung WB2200F

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC WB2200F 
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 WB2200F GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
IntroducedJanuary 2014March 2010More recent by 46 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB2200F

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC WB2200F 
Manually focus  More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements
Selfie screen  Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Lack of Touch friendly screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has external measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has sizing of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") along with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus the WB2200F.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB2200F is 85 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Generally, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by researching specs. The photograph here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB2200F.
All in all, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB2200F will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
	
			Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB2200F Portrait photography factors
36
 you can focus manually
 exports RAW formats
 does not have liveview
 low resolution sensor (10MP)
 sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
44
 has manual focus
 good MP (16 megapixels)
 has face detection focus
 external flash not possible
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Street Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Street photography camera
 Samsung WB2200F as a Street photography camera
65
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW formats
 lighter than others (355 grams)
 screen is fixed
 sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
40
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 no articulating screen
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
 heavier than average in class (708g)
Photography Glossary
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography info
Samsung WB2200F Sports photography info
25
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 does not have liveview
 continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
 low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
 doesn't have phase detect auto focus
53
 long zoom range (20-1200mm  60.0 x zoom)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 good MP (16 megapixels)
 has tracking autofocus
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography information
Samsung WB2200F Travel photography information
60
 lighter than others (355 grams)
 flash built-in
 pretty wide (24mm)
 low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
 doesn't have selfie friendly screen
 slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
51
 good MP (16MP)
 built-in flash
 relatively wide (20mm)
 long reach (1200mm)
 doesn't have Time Lapse mode
 heavier than average in class (708g)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly display
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Landscape Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography info
Samsung WB2200F Landscape photography info
47
 you can focus manually
 pretty wide (24mm)
 screen size is decent (3 inches)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW formats
 can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
 does not have liveview
 low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
46
 has manual focus
 relatively wide (20mm)
 screen is a good size (3 inch)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 good MP (16 megapixels)
 can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
 doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Vlogging with Samsung WB2200F
28
 pretty wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than others (355 grams)
 slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
 doesn't have selfie friendly screen
 low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
 doesn't have external microphone jack
25
 relatively wide (20mm)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 has face detection focus
 high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly display
 doesn't have external mic jack
 heavier than average in class (708g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB2200F
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung WB2200F
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung WB2200F
Category Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-03-18 2014-01-07
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3 and  16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW format    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
AF touch    
AF continuous    
AF single    
AF tracking    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detect focusing    
Contract detect focusing    
Phase detect focusing    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-72mm (3.0x) 20-1200mm (60.0x)
Max aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch capability    
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 200k dot
Features
Lowest shutter speed 180 secs 1/8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames per sec 8.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance 4.50 m 6.00 m (ISO Auto)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix
Hot shoe    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 355 grams (0.78 lbs) 708 grams (1.56 lbs)
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 pictures -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID - BP-1410
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) -
Time lapse feature    
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD, SDHC, SCXC
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $349 $599