Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F

Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung WB2200F front
Portability
59
Imaging
40
Features
48
Overall
43

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Revealed March 2010
Samsung WB2200F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F Overview

Its time to look closer at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and WB2200F (16MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and WB2200F (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was released 4 years earlier than the WB2200F and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC grades against the WB2200F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung WB2200F

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC WB2200F 
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 WB2200F GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
IntroducedJanuary 2014March 2010More recent by 46 months

Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB2200F

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC WB2200F 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has external measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has sizing of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") along with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus the WB2200F.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB2200F is 85 and 59 respectively.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by researching specs. The photograph here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB2200F.

All in all, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB2200F will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB2200F Portrait photography factors
36
you can focus manually
exports RAW formats
does not have liveview
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
44
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
has face detection focus
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB2200F as a Street photography camera
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
lighter than others (355 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
heavier than average in class (708g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography info
Samsung WB2200F Sports photography info
25
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not have liveview
continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
53
long zoom range (20-1200mm 60.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography information
Samsung WB2200F Travel photography information
60
lighter than others (355 grams)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
51
good MP (16MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (20mm)
long reach (1200mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than average in class (708g)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography info
Samsung WB2200F Landscape photography info
47
you can focus manually
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
does not have liveview
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
46
has manual focus
relatively wide (20mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Vlogging with Samsung WB2200F
28
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (355 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone jack
25
relatively wide (20mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
doesn't have external mic jack
heavier than average in class (708g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB2200F
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung WB2200F
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung WB2200F
Category Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-03-18 2014-01-07
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-72mm (3.0x) 20-1200mm (60.0x)
Max aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 200k dot
Features
Lowest shutter speed 180 secs 1/8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames per sec 8.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.50 m 6.00 m (ISO Auto)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 355 grams (0.78 lbs) 708 grams (1.56 lbs)
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 pictures -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID - BP-1410
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) -
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD, SDHC, SCXC
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $349 $599