Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB50F
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2014
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Its time to look closer at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB50F, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and WB50F (16MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and WB50F (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was brought out 4 years earlier than the WB50F which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up versus the WB50F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC & Samsung WB50F. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung WB50F
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
WB50F | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | March 2010 | Newer by 46 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB50F
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has outer measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB50F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus the WB50F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB50F is 85 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB50F.
As you can see, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung WB50F will provide more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will be behind in sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung WB50F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung WB50F |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-03-18 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180 seconds | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.50 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355g (0.78 pounds) | 207g (0.46 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $349 | $180 |