Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB750
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Announced March 2010
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Launched September 2011
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB750, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and WB750 (13MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and WB750 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was revealed 17 months earlier than the WB750 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up vs the WB750 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB750. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery and Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung WB750
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WB750 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
WB750 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2011 | March 2010 | Fresher by 17 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB750
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WB750 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has got exterior measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Samsung WB750 has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB750 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC against the WB750.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB750 is 85 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing only by checking technical specs. The graphic below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB750.
As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB750 will resolve greater detail because of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots far more aggressively. The older GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung WB750 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung WB750 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-03-18 | 2011-09-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4096 x 3072 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | 3.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $349 | $339 |