Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB850F
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Revealed March 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Launched January 2012
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB850F Overview
Here is a comprehensive review of the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB850F, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and WB850F (16MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and WB850F (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was released 22 months prior to the WB850F making the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB850F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores against the WB850F for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC & Samsung WB850F. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung WB850F
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WB850F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 614k | Sharper display (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
WB850F | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | March 2010 | Fresher by 22 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB850F
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WB850F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has got outer dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB850F has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB850F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs the WB850F.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB850F is 85 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through specs. The graphic below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB850F.
All in all, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB850F will render more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung WB850F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung WB850F |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-03-18 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | AMOLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.50 m | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355g (0.78 pounds) | 250g (0.55 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $349 | $599 |