Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Launched February 2014
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Sigma. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was unveiled 4 years before the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC grades against the DP2 Quattro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
DP2 Quattro | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | March 2010 | Fresher by 47 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Sigma DP2 Quattro
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has got external dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has sizing of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC against the DP2 Quattro.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and DP2 Quattro is 85 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by researching specs. The photograph below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and DP2 Quattro.
All in all, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC having a smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will render extra detail having an extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-03-18 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lbs) | 395 gr (0.87 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $349 | $931 |