Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony HX350
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38


62 Imaging
46 Features
51 Overall
48
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony HX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Released March 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Announced December 2016

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony HX350 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony HX350, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and HX350 (20MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and HX350 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was manufactured 7 years before the HX350 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX350 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores against the HX350 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony HX350 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery & Sony HX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Sony HX350
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | HX350 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
HX350 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2016 | ![]() | March 2010 | Newer by 82 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+2k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Sony HX350
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | HX350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC provides physical dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Sony HX350 has sizing of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") with a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony HX350 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC against the HX350.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and HX350 is 85 and 62 respectively.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by checking specifications. The image below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and HX350.
To sum up, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Sony HX350 will give extra detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony HX350 Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-03-18 | 2016-12-20 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 202k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.50 m | 8.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lb) | 652 gr (1.44 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 images | 300 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $349 | - |