Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900

Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Launched March 2010
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900 Overview

Let's look more closely at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is relatively close but the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and T900 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was introduced 14 months after the T900 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summation of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores versus the T900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Sony T900

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC T900 
IntroducedMarch 2010February 2009Newer by 14 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 T900 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Screen dimension3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution922k920kSharper screen (+2k dot)
Touch screen  Quickly navigate
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Sony T900

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC T900 
Manual focus  More precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Neither contains selfie screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For those who are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has got physical dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Sony T900 has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs the T900.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900 size comparison
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and T900 is 85 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Oftentimes, it is very hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through technical specs. The pic underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and T900.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Sony T900 will result in more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
	
			Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Portrait photography camera
 Sony T900 as a Portrait photography camera
36
 focusing manually
 saves RAW files
 does not have liveview
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 very small sensor size (1/1.7")
27
 focusing manually
 manual exposure not available
 cannot use external flash
 sensor resolution not great (12MP)
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Street Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography features
Sony T900 Street photography features
65
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 saves RAW files
 lighter than others (355g)
 no moving screen
 very small sensor size (1/1.7")
57
 image stabilization (Optical)
 screen does not articulate
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography factors
Sony T900 Sports photography factors
25
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 does not have liveview
 slow fps (2.0 fps)
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 very small sensor size (1/1.7")
 doesn't have phase detect AF
24
 image stabilization (Optical)
 maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,000 seconds)
 continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames per second)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 sensor resolution not great (12MP)
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography highlights
Sony T900 Travel photography highlights
60
 lighter than others (355 grams)
 has built in flash
 quite wide (24mm)
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
51
 flash built-in
 no Timelapse mode
 sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Landscape Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography info
Sony T900 Landscape photography info
47
 focusing manually
 quite wide (24mm)
 screen is a good size (3 inch)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 saves RAW files
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
 does not have liveview
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 very small sensor size (1/1.7")
36
 focusing manually
 big screen (3.5 inches)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 manual exposure not available
 sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW files
 no Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Vlogging Comparison
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Vlogging camera
 Sony T900 as a Vlogging camera
28
 quite wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than others (355g)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
 does not have microphone port
28
 touchscreen capability
 image stabilization (Optical)
 wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
 no external microphone jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Sony T900
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Brand Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Category Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Launched 2010-03-18 2009-02-17
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch to focus    
Continuous autofocus    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Autofocus center weighted    
Autofocus multi area    
Autofocus live view    
Face detection focus    
Contract detection focus    
Phase detection focus    
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-72mm (3.0x) 35-140mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/3.5-10.0
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3.5 inches
Resolution of screen 920k dot 922k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch friendly    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 180 seconds 2 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 4.50 m 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash    
Auto exposure bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 355g (0.78 lb) 143g (0.32 lb)
Dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 images -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $349 $300