Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is relatively close but the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and T900 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was introduced 14 months after the T900 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summation of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores versus the T900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Sony T900
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2010 | February 2009 | Newer by 14 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
T900 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 920k | Sharper screen (+2k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Sony T900
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has got physical dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Sony T900 has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs the T900.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and T900 is 85 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through technical specs. The pic underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and T900.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Sony T900 will result in more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony T900 Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2010-03-18 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180 seconds | 2 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.50 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355g (0.78 lb) | 143g (0.32 lb) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $349 | $300 |