Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony TX200V
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Released March 2010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Released January 2012
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony TX200V Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Sony TX200V, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and TX200V (18MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and TX200V (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was manufactured 22 months prior to the TX200V which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores against the TX200V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony TX200V Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Sony TX200V
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
TX200V | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | March 2010 | More recent by 22 months | |
Screen size | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 920k | Crisper screen (+310k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Sony TX200V
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has physical dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Sony TX200V has specifications of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus Sony TX200V in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and the TX200V.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and TX200V is 85 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by seeing specs. The visual underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and TX200V.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Sony TX200V will show more detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2010-03-18 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180s | 2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355g (0.78 pounds) | 129g (0.28 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 photographs | 220 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $349 | $500 |