Ricoh PX vs Ricoh WG-M1
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Ricoh PX vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh PX vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Ricoh PX versus Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof and both are designed by Ricoh. The image resolution of the PX (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly similar and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe PX was released 4 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the PX scores versus the WG-M1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh PX vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh PX and Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh PX Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Ricoh WG-M1
| PX | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Ricoh PX
| WG-M1 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | August 2011 | More recent by 37 months |
Common features in the Ricoh PX and Ricoh WG-M1
| PX | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Ricoh PX vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh PX has got physical measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh PX versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the PX vs the WG-M1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the PX and WG-M1 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh PX vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by reading specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the PX and WG-M1.
Plainly, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh PX to offer more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The older PX is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh PX vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh PX vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Ricoh PX | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model | Ricoh PX | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-08-16 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 156 grams (0.34 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-100 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $329 | $2,000 |