Ricoh PX vs Samsung CL5
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Ricoh PX vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Launched August 2011
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Launched February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL10
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh PX vs Samsung CL5 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Ricoh PX vs Samsung CL5, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the PX (16MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the PX (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") come with totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe PX was revealed 2 years after the CL5 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the PX matches up versus the CL5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh PX vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh PX & Samsung CL5. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh PX Gallery & Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Samsung CL5
| PX | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2011 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 31 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Ricoh PX
| CL5 | PX |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh PX and Samsung CL5
| PX | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Ricoh PX vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh PX provides exterior dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL5 has dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh PX vs Samsung CL5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the PX vs the CL5.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the PX and CL5 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by checking out technical specs. The picture here might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the PX and CL5.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The PX with its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh PX will show more detail because of its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The younger PX is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh PX vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
| Ricoh PX | Samsung CL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh PX | Samsung CL5 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2011-08-16 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.5-4.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 156g (0.34 lb) | 141g (0.31 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-100 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $329 | $391 |