Ricoh PX vs Samsung NX2000
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
89 Imaging
63 Features
68 Overall
65
Ricoh PX vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Launched November 2013
- Previous Model is Samsung NX1100
- Successor is Samsung NX3000
Ricoh PX vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Ricoh PX and Samsung NX2000, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the PX (16MP) and the NX2000 (20MP) is very close but the PX (1/2.3") and NX2000 (APS-C) use different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe PX was introduced 3 years earlier than the NX2000 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the PX scores against the NX2000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh PX & Samsung NX2000. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh PX Gallery & Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Samsung NX2000
PX | NX2000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Ricoh PX
NX2000 | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2013 | August 2011 | Newer by 27 months | |
Display sizing | 3.7" | 2.7" | Larger display (+1") | |
Display resolution | 1152k | 230k | Clearer display (+922k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh PX and Samsung NX2000
PX | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh PX vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh PX offers outside dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung NX2000 has measurements of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh PX and Samsung NX2000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the PX against the NX2000.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the PX and NX2000 is 95 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through specs. The pic below will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the PX and NX2000.
All in all, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The PX using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Samsung NX2000 will provide you with greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged PX will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh PX vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
Ricoh PX | Samsung NX2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh PX | Samsung NX2000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2011-08-16 | 2013-11-30 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,152k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 156 grams (0.34 lbs) | 228 grams (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 75 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 908 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-100 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $329 | $599 |