Ricoh PX vs Samsung NX300M
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Ricoh PX vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Released January 2013
Ricoh PX vs Samsung NX300M Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Ricoh PX vs Samsung NX300M, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the PX (16MP) and the NX300M (20MP) is very well matched but the PX (1/2.3") and NX300M (APS-C) come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe PX was introduced 16 months prior to the NX300M making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the PX grades vs the NX300M when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung NX300M Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh PX and Samsung NX300M. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh PX Gallery and Samsung NX300M Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Samsung NX300M
PX | NX300M |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Ricoh PX
NX300M | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | August 2011 | Newer by 16 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3.3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 768k | 230k | Sharper display (+538k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh PX and Samsung NX300M
PX | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Ricoh PX vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh PX comes with external measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung NX300M has specifications of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh PX vs Samsung NX300M in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the PX compared to the NX300M.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the PX and NX300M is 95 and 86 respectively.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by looking at technical specs. The picture below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the PX and NX300M.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The PX having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Samsung NX300M will resolve greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged PX is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh PX vs Samsung NX300M Specifications
Ricoh PX | Samsung NX300M | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh PX | Samsung NX300M |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-08-16 | 2013-01-03 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | - |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3.3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 768 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 156 gr (0.34 pounds) | 331 gr (0.73 pounds) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-100 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $329 | $699 |