Clicky

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL102

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37
Ricoh PX front
 
Samsung SL102 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs

Ricoh PX
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Announced August 2011
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Released January 2009
  • Also referred to as ES55
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL102 Overview

Here, we will be matching up the Ricoh PX versus Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the PX (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The PX was manufactured 2 years after the SL102 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise summation of how the PX grades versus the SL102 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Samsung SL102

 PX SL102 
ReleasedAugust 2011January 2009Newer by 32 months
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Screen size2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh PX

 SL102 PX 

Common features in the Ricoh PX and Samsung SL102

 PX SL102 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh PX has got exterior dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

See the Ricoh PX versus Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the PX and the SL102.

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL102 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the PX and SL102 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions only by looking at specs. The image below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the PX and SL102.

All in all, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Ricoh PX to resolve greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern PX should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh PX as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Portrait photography camera
43
manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
features face detection focus
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
25
provides face detect focus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Ricoh PX Street photography factors
Samsung SL102 Street photography factors
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
55
lighter than competitors in class (116g)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Ricoh PX Sports photography factors
Samsung SL102 Sports photography factors
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
environment sealing
max frames per second very slow (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
16
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Ricoh PX Travel photography information
Samsung SL102 Travel photography information
68
environment sealing
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.9)
62
lighter than competitors in class (116 grams)
has built in flash
great max aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse function
MP count low (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh PX Landscape photography features
Samsung SL102 Landscape photography features
47
manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
environment sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
27
great max aperture (f)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
small screen (2.5")
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh PX Vlogging details
Samsung SL102 Vlogging details
31
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focus
slow max aperture (f3.9)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone support
30
great max aperture (f)
provides face detect focus
lighter than competitors in class (116g)
wide angle not good (35mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of microphone support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL102 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh PX and Samsung SL102
 Ricoh PXSamsung SL102
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh PX Samsung SL102
Alternate name - ES55
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2011-08-16 2009-01-08
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3072 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.9-5.4 -
Macro focus range 3cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 2.5 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.50 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 156g (0.34 lbs) 116g (0.26 lbs)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model DB-100 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $329 $130