Clicky

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL202

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37
Ricoh PX front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Ricoh PX
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Launched August 2011
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Alternate Name is PL50
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL202 Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the PX (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The PX was introduced 2 years after the SL202 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a short view of how the PX matches up vs the SL202 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Samsung SL202

 PX SL202 
ReleasedAugust 2011February 2009Newer by 31 months
Manual focus Dial accurate focus

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Ricoh PX

 SL202 PX 

Common features in the Ricoh PX and Samsung SL202

 PX SL202 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display sizing
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh PX has got exterior dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL202 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the PX compared to the SL202.

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the PX and SL202 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions merely by checking out technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the PX and SL202.

As you have seen, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh PX to produce greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger PX provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh PX Portrait photography advice
Samsung SL202 Portrait photography advice
43
focusing manually
decent MP (16MP)
has face detection focusing
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
25
features face detection focus
manual focus not available
no manual mode
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh PX as a Street photography camera
Samsung SL202 as a Street photography camera
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
47
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Ricoh PX Sports photography factors
Samsung SL202 Sports photography factors
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
weather sealing
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
16
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Ricoh PX Travel photography information
Samsung SL202 Travel photography information
68
weather sealing
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
no Timelapse recording
does not have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
57
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh PX Landscape photography information
Samsung SL202 Landscape photography information
47
focusing manually
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
weather sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.7")
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Timelapse recording
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
manual focus not available
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7")
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh PX
Vlogging with Samsung SL202
31
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
does not have selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone jack
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
features face detection focus
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh PX and Samsung SL202
 Ricoh PXSamsung SL202
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh PX Samsung SL202
Also called as - PL50
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2011-08-16 2009-02-17
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3072 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture f/3.9-5.4 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focusing range 3cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 4.60 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 156 grams (0.34 pounds) 168 grams (0.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-100 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $329 $140