Clicky

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL620

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37
Ricoh PX front
 
Samsung SL620 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs

Ricoh PX
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Introduced August 2011
Samsung SL620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Alternative Name is PL65
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL620 Overview

Lets examine more in depth at the Ricoh PX and Samsung SL620, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the PX (16MP) and SL620 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

The PX was launched 2 years after the SL620 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the PX grades versus the SL620 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Samsung SL620

 PX SL620 
ReleasedAugust 2011February 2009More modern by 31 months
Focus manually Very exact focusing

Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Ricoh PX

 SL620 PX 

Common features in the Ricoh PX and Samsung SL620

 PX SL620 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing2.7"2.7"Equivalent display dimensions
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh PX has got exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung SL620 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh PX and Samsung SL620 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the PX vs the SL620.

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL620 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the PX and SL620 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through specs. The image underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the PX and SL620.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh PX to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The newer PX will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh PX Portrait photography highlights
Samsung SL620 Portrait photography highlights
43
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
26
provides face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh PX
Street photography with Samsung SL620
63
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
47
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
heavier than competition in class (168g)
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh PX
Sports photography with Samsung SL620
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
17
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh PX
Travel photography with Samsung SL620
68
environment sealing
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
50
flash built-in
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (168 grams)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh PX Landscape photography details
Samsung SL620 Landscape photography details
47
you can focus manually
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7")
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
23
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh PX Vlogging highlights
Samsung SL620 Vlogging highlights
31
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone jack
24
provides face detection focus
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
no external mic support
heavier than competition in class (168g)
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL620 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh PX and Samsung SL620
 Ricoh PXSamsung SL620
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh PX Samsung SL620
Also called as - PL65
Type Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Introduced 2011-08-16 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3072 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 35-175mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.9-5.4 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focus range 3cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.50 m 4.60 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 156 gr (0.34 lb) 168 gr (0.37 lb)
Dimensions 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model DB-100 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail cost $329 $200