Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL620
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL65
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Ricoh PX and Samsung SL620, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the PX (16MP) and SL620 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe PX was launched 2 years after the SL620 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the PX grades versus the SL620 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh PX & Samsung SL620. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh PX Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Samsung SL620
| PX | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2011 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 31 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Ricoh PX
| SL620 | PX |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh PX and Samsung SL620
| PX | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh PX has got exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung SL620 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh PX and Samsung SL620 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the PX vs the SL620.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the PX and SL620 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through specs. The image underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the PX and SL620.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh PX to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The newer PX will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Ricoh PX vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Ricoh PX | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh PX | Samsung SL620 |
| Also called as | - | PL65 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2011-08-16 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 156 gr (0.34 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | DB-100 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $329 | $200 |