Clicky

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL240

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37
Ricoh PX front
 
Samsung TL240 front
Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
32
Overall
35

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs

Ricoh PX
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Announced August 2011
Samsung TL240
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
  • Announced January 2010
  • Additionally referred to as ST5000
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL240 Overview

Lets look closer at the Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL240, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the PX (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is pretty close and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The PX was launched 20 months after the TL240 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the PX grades versus the TL240 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Samsung TL240

 PX TL240 
AnnouncedAugust 2011January 2010More modern by 20 months
Focus manually Very precise focusing

Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Ricoh PX

 TL240 PX 
Screen sizing3.5"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.8")
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh PX and Samsung TL240

 PX TL240 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh PX has external dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL240 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the PX and the TL240.

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL240 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the PX and TL240 is 95 and 95 respectively.

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL240 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by looking through technical specs. The picture underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the PX and TL240.

As you have seen, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh PX to provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern PX provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL240 sensor size comparison

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh PX Portrait photography details
Samsung TL240 Portrait photography details
43
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has face detect autofocus
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
28
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Ricoh PX Street photography advice
Samsung TL240 Street photography advice
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
60
built in image stabilization (Optical)
boasts touch to focus
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
heavier than competition (160g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh PX as a Sports photography camera
Samsung TL240 as a Sports photography camera
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has tracking focus
weather sealing
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
43
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
has tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Ricoh PX Travel photography highlights
Samsung TL240 Travel photography highlights
68
weather sealing
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
does not posses selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.9)
60
boasts touch to focus
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (160g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (31mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh PX Landscape photography highlights
Samsung TL240 Landscape photography highlights
47
manual focus
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
weather sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
37
screen larger than average (3.5 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
manual focus not available
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (31mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh PX Vlogging highlights
Samsung TL240 Vlogging highlights
31
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
slow max aperture (f3.9)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone socket
27
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (31mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic port
heavier than competition (160 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL240 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh PX and Samsung TL240
 Ricoh PXSamsung TL240
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh PX Samsung TL240
Alternate name - ST5000
Class Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Announced 2011-08-16 2010-01-06
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3072 4334 x 3256
Maximum native ISO 3200 4800
Maximum enhanced ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 31-217mm (7.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.9-5.4 f/3.3-5.5
Macro focus distance 3cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3.5 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 156g (0.34 pounds) 160g (0.35 pounds)
Dimensions 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model DB-100 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $329 $171