Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL320
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternative Name is WB1000
Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Ricoh PX versus Samsung TL320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the PX (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe PX was released 2 years later than the TL320 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the PX grades vs the TL320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh PX and Samsung TL320. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh PX Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Samsung TL320
PX | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2011 | February 2009 | Fresher by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh PX
TL320 | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh PX and Samsung TL320
PX | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh PX enjoys external measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the Ricoh PX versus Samsung TL320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the PX and the TL320.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the PX and TL320 is 95 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing just by researching specs. The visual underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the PX and TL320.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh PX to result in extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The fresher PX provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
Ricoh PX | Samsung TL320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh PX | Samsung TL320 |
Also called | - | WB1000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2011-08-16 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 156 grams (0.34 lb) | - |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-100 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $329 | $380 |