Clicky

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL320

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37
Ricoh PX front
 
Samsung TL320 front
Portability
98
Imaging
34
Features
36
Overall
34

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs

Ricoh PX
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Revealed August 2011
Samsung TL320
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
  • n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
  • Announced February 2009
  • Alternative Name is WB1000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL320 Overview

Lets examine more in depth at the Ricoh PX versus Samsung TL320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the PX (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The PX was released 2 years later than the TL320 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the PX grades vs the TL320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Samsung TL320

 PX TL320 
AnnouncedAugust 2011February 2009Fresher by 31 months

Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh PX

 TL320 PX 
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh PX and Samsung TL320

 PX TL320 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh PX enjoys external measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

See the Ricoh PX versus Samsung TL320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the PX and the TL320.

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL320 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the PX and TL320 is 95 and 98 respectively.

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing just by researching specs. The visual underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the PX and TL320.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh PX to result in extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The fresher PX provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh PX Portrait photography info
Samsung TL320 Portrait photography info
43
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
supports face detect focusing
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
33
focusing manually
comes with face detection focusing
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh PX Street photography advice
Samsung TL320 Street photography advice
63
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
58
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh PX Sports photography information
Samsung TL320 Sports photography information
44
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
environment sealing
max fps low (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
29
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh PX
Travel photography with Samsung TL320
68
environment sealing
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
59
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
missing Timelapse mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh PX
Landscape photography with Samsung TL320
47
focusing manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
environment sealing
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
43
focusing manually
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh PX Vlogging highlights
Samsung TL320 Vlogging highlights
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focusing
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic port
31
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh PX vs Samsung TL320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh PX and Samsung TL320
 Ricoh PXSamsung TL320
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh PX Samsung TL320
Also called - WB1000
Category Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Revealed 2011-08-16 2009-02-23
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4608 x 3072 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-120mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/3.9-5.4 f/2.8-5.8
Macro focus range 3cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 16 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 156 grams (0.34 lb) -
Dimensions 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model DB-100 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $329 $380