Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB250F
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Photography Glossary Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB250F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the PX (16MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is very similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe PX was revealed 17 months before the WB250F making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the PX grades against the WB250F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh PX & Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh PX Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Samsung WB250F
| PX | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Ricoh PX
| WB250F | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | August 2011 | More modern by 17 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh PX and Samsung WB250F
| PX | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh PX enjoys exterior dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung WB250F has measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB250F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the PX versus the WB250F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the PX and WB250F is 95 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes only by reading a spec sheet. The pic below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the PX and WB250F.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh PX to offer you more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged PX is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Ricoh PX | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh PX | Samsung WB250F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-08-16 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 156g (0.34 pounds) | 226g (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | DB-100 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $329 | $250 |