Clicky

Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37
Ricoh PX front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Ricoh PX
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Revealed August 2011
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB350F Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Ricoh PX and Samsung WB350F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the PX (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The PX was announced 3 years earlier than the WB350F and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the PX grades vs the WB350F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Samsung WB350F

 PX WB350F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh PX

 WB350F PX 
IntroducedJanuary 2014August 2011Fresher by 29 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh PX and Samsung WB350F

 PX WB350F 
Manual focus More exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh PX enjoys outside dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has specifications of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Analyze the Ricoh PX and Samsung WB350F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the PX compared to the WB350F.

Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the PX and WB350F is 95 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through specifications. The visual here should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the PX and WB350F.

Plainly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of files but you really should factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The older PX will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh PX Portrait photography details
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography details
43
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
comes with face detection focus
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
40
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh PX
Street photography with Samsung WB350F
63
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (276g)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh PX
Sports photography with Samsung WB350F
44
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment sealing
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
50
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Ricoh PX Travel photography advice
Samsung WB350F Travel photography advice
68
environment sealing
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
69
lighter than average (276g)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
no Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh PX
Landscape photography with Samsung WB350F
47
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7")
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
50
manual focus
pretty wide (23mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh PX
Vlogging with Samsung WB350F
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic socket
34
pretty wide (23mm)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (276g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh PX vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh PX and Samsung WB350F
 Ricoh PXSamsung WB350F
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh PX Samsung WB350F
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2011-08-16 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3
Max resolution 4608 x 3072 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Max aperture f/3.9-5.4 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 3cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs 16 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.50 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 156 gr (0.34 lbs) 276 gr (0.61 lbs)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-100 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) -
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $329 $260