Ricoh PX vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
82 Imaging
56 Features
30 Overall
45
Ricoh PX vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Announced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Announced February 2012
- Renewed by Sigma DP2 Merrill
Ricoh PX vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Ricoh PX vs Sigma DP1 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the PX (16MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively well matched but the PX (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe PX was manufactured 5 months before the DP1 Merrill so they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the PX scores against the DP1 Merrill in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh PX vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh PX and Sigma DP1 Merrill. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh PX Gallery and Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
PX | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 2.7" | " | Bigger screen (+2.7") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Ricoh PX
DP1 Merrill | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh PX and Sigma DP1 Merrill
PX | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2011 | February 2012 | Similar generation | |
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh PX vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh PX has outside dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sigma DP1 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh PX vs Sigma DP1 Merrill in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the PX against the DP1 Merrill.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the PX and DP1 Merrill is 95 and 82 respectively.
Ricoh PX vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing just by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the PX and DP1 Merrill.
Clearly, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The PX featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Ricoh PX will resolve more detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively.
Ricoh PX vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh PX vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh PX | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh PX | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-08-16 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4704 x 3136 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | () |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | - |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 156 grams (0.34 pounds) | 330 grams (0.73 pounds) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | DB-100 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $329 | $1,250 |