Ricoh PX vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Ricoh PX vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Released February 2012
- Earlier Model is Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Successor is Sigma DP3 Merrill
Ricoh PX vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Ricoh PX versus Sigma DP2 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Sigma. The image resolution of the PX (16MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is relatively comparable but the PX (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe PX was unveiled 5 months before the DP2 Merrill which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the PX grades vs the DP2 Merrill when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh PX vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh PX and Sigma DP2 Merrill. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh PX Gallery and Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
PX | DP2 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Ricoh PX
DP2 Merrill | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh PX and Sigma DP2 Merrill
PX | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2011 | February 2012 | Same generation | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Ricoh PX vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh PX features outer measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh PX versus Sigma DP2 Merrill in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the PX and the DP2 Merrill.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the PX and DP2 Merrill is 95 and 83 respectively.
Ricoh PX vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements only by checking out technical specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the PX and DP2 Merrill.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The PX with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Ricoh PX will produce more detail having an extra 1MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively.
Ricoh PX vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh PX vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh PX | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh PX | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-08-16 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4704 x 3136 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640x480 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 156g (0.34 lbs) | 330g (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-100 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $329 | $931 |