Ricoh PX vs Sigma Quattro
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Ricoh PX vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
Ricoh PX vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh PX versus Sigma Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the PX (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the PX (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe PX was announced 5 years earlier than the Quattro which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the PX grades vs the Quattro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh PX vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh PX & Sigma sd Quattro. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh PX Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Sigma Quattro
PX | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Ricoh PX
Quattro | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | August 2011 | More modern by 55 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 230k | Clearer display (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh PX and Sigma Quattro
PX | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh PX vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh PX has got physical measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh PX versus Sigma Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the PX compared to the Quattro.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the PX and Quattro is 95 and 63 respectively.
Ricoh PX vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading through a spec sheet. The image here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the PX and Quattro.
Clearly, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The PX having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sigma Quattro will give you more detail with its extra 13 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged PX is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh PX vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh PX vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Ricoh PX | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh PX | Sigma sd Quattro |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-08-16 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 29MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | - |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 156 gr (0.34 lbs) | 625 gr (1.38 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-100 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $329 | $738 |