Ricoh PX vs Sigma Quattro H
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
78 Imaging
72 Features
59 Overall
66
Ricoh PX vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Launched August 2011
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
Ricoh PX vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Ricoh PX versus Sigma Quattro H, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the PX (16MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the PX (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) offer totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe PX was unveiled 5 years earlier than the Quattro H which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the PX matches up against the Quattro H in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh PX vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh PX & Sigma sd Quattro H. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh PX Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Sigma Quattro H
PX | Quattro H |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Ricoh PX
Quattro H | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | August 2011 | More modern by 55 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh PX and Sigma Quattro H
PX | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Ricoh PX vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh PX enjoys physical dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro H has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh PX versus Sigma Quattro H in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the PX against the Quattro H.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the PX and Quattro H is 95 and 78 respectively.
Ricoh PX vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by checking technical specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the PX and Quattro H.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The PX with its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Sigma Quattro H will give you extra detail having an extra 29 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged PX is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh PX vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh PX vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
Ricoh PX | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh PX | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-08-16 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 45 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 6200 x 4152 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 156 gr (0.34 pounds) | - |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | DB-100 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $329 | $1,134 |