Ricoh PX vs Sony WX220
95 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
96 Imaging
42 Features
41 Overall
41
Ricoh PX vs Sony WX220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Launched February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh PX vs Sony WX220 Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Ricoh PX and Sony WX220, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the PX (16MP) and the WX220 (18MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe PX was released 3 years earlier than the WX220 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera and the Sony WX220 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the PX grades versus the WX220 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh PX vs Sony WX220 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh PX & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh PX Gallery & Sony WX220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Sony WX220
| PX | WX220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Ricoh PX
| WX220 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 | August 2011 | More modern by 30 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh PX and Sony WX220
| PX | WX220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Ricoh PX vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh PX comes with exterior dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony WX220 has sizing of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh PX and Sony WX220 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the PX compared to the WX220.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the PX and WX220 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh PX vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by going through a spec sheet. The picture below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the PX and WX220.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Sony WX220 to provide extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged PX will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh PX vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh PX vs Sony WX220 Specifications
| Ricoh PX | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh PX | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2011-08-16 | 2014-02-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.70 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 156g (0.34 lb) | 121g (0.27 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 210 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-100 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $329 | $198 |