Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX100
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f6b9/0f6b92e8e7b3c6a64e703e8b995daab652fd7cfe" alt="Ricoh WG-20 front Ricoh WG-20 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5277/b527708835db132b53ec37264dc6230bff75beef" alt="Samsung NX100 front Samsung NX100 front"
88 Imaging
55 Features
54 Overall
54
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 282g - 120 x 71 x 35mm
- Introduced September 2010
- Successor is Samsung NX200
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX100 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Ricoh WG-20 and Samsung NX100, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-20 (14MP) and the NX100 (15MP) is pretty comparable but the WG-20 (1/2.3") and NX100 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The WG-20 was released 3 years later than the NX100 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX100 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the WG-20 matches up against the NX100 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX100 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-20 & Samsung NX100. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-20 Gallery & Samsung NX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Samsung NX100
WG-20 | NX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | September 2010 | More recent by 42 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX100 over the Ricoh WG-20
NX100 | WG-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-20 and Samsung NX100
WG-20 | NX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX100 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-20 features external dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs) and the Samsung NX100 has dimensions of 120mm x 71mm x 35mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 282 grams (0.62 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-20 and Samsung NX100 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-20 versus the NX100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57a9a/57a9aa4287e32f1ea69820d873fc4f3795452353" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX100 size comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX100 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-20 and NX100 is 93 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60472/6047244dcc23e9c163b95ab57f837ca2c8ba92bd" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX100 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX100 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX100 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through technical specs. The visual underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-20 and NX100.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-20 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Samsung NX100 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher WG-20 provides an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf3a6/cf3a6393335d6ed8008653178ff57c8acae3a455" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX100 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX100 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d5f5/6d5f5e889ba7a86a65b7a09566acb642c9fc58f4" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung NX100 Specifications
Ricoh WG-20 | Samsung NX100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-20 | Samsung NX100 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2010-09-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | DRIMe Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | VGA AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 164 gr (0.36 lbs) | 282 gr (0.62 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 120 x 71 x 35mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 62 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 563 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 photos | 420 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $370 | $386 |