Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL205
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f6b9/0f6b92e8e7b3c6a64e703e8b995daab652fd7cfe" alt="Ricoh WG-20 front Ricoh WG-20 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ce2e/7ce2ede9fa2768a825fe05b5a60a4314f7a7f1a8" alt="Samsung TL205 front Samsung TL205 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally referred to as PL100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL205 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL205, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-20 (14MP) and the TL205 (12MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The WG-20 was launched 4 years after the TL205 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the WG-20 matches up vs the TL205 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-20 and Samsung TL205. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-20 Gallery and Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Samsung TL205
WG-20 | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 50 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Ricoh WG-20
TL205 | WG-20 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-20 and Samsung TL205
WG-20 | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-20 offers exterior measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs) and the Samsung TL205 has specifications of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL205 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-20 against the TL205.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/daf61/daf61731ed9b849cda2ee27f727af579f859c565" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL205 size comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL205 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-20 and TL205 is 93 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4fea/f4fea04304a519d725cff9cd5671c8b556bf3b9e" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL205 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL205 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking a spec sheet. The picture below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-20 and TL205.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-20 to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more modern WG-20 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53e82/53e8271ea9c887a91dbade1ebea54781aa0866b2" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL205 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL205 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/183f5/183f583317aaf22fb4aba394acf746254f7b8f2f" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
Ricoh WG-20 | Samsung TL205 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-20 | Samsung TL205 |
Also Known as | - | PL100 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.0-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 164 gr (0.36 pounds) | 177 gr (0.39 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $370 | $180 |